Jack Donovan’s Becoming a Barbarian. Tribalism and Loyalty
Posted on June 23, 2016
I have just read Jack Donovan’s latest book; Becoming a Barbarian and thought to take this as an opportunity to recommend it wholeheartedly. One of the greatest merits of the book is actually the description of the powers to be, “The Empire of Nothing” as he puts it; a phrase often also used by Paul Waggener of Operation Werewolf. Although one might argue that too little emphasis is put on Zionist control of media and finance the analyses is still highly relevant and one I can agree on (more so seen from an economic and cultural perspective than a political though). The Empire of Nothing is a rootless, mass consumerist culture where the only loyalty is to Mammon (money) and identities can be bought and sold as commodities on the global market. Everything that is an obstacle towards unbridled consumerism is a threat, such as national and tribal identities.
Another very good point that the book raises and that everyone should take to heart (and explain to others), is the complete inability for any single human being to care about exactly everyone else in the world. Donovan brings up a solid example (imagine if you had to write down the name of every human in the world – it would take a lifetime), this illustrates quite well the inability to actually care deeply about everyone. Showing solidarity with a starving child in Africa is virtue signalling; it is impossible to feel deep sorrow for every child that is living in unfortunate circumstances.
The tribalist mindset, much like the nationalist mindset (but on a smaller scale), is about being a true friend to your tribe. Quoting Aristotle “A friend to all is a friend to none“, this makes perfect sense; if you care about everyone and if you hold everyone in the same regard you are not placing particularly much value on anyone. If everyone is the same and equal; everyone is easily replaced, and this is also endemic to the modern world; with loose loyalties and fleeting connections. As I see it there are too many guys who are investing quality time in people they will never have a deeper relationship with, and that is time that could be spent with your brothers.
Viewing your friends in a similar manner as you view your girlfriend will serve you well; you are not handing roses out to random females. You are not giving love and affection to random females that you have no connection with. You are not investing time in a girl you have no romantic interest in. Translating this into friendship (or brotherhood) terms, you should not be everyone’s friend, do not give love and loyalty towards random guys that you have no deeper shared loyalty with. Do not invest your time building a friendship with men of questionable honour.
I do not have any friends that are not a) either training in the gym or martial arts, and b) are nationalists or traditionalists. The reason for this is simple; I value myself, I value my time and whom I chose to build significant relationships with. You should also value yourself and value your time; make sure you invest it in quality people who are of a glorious mindset and who will help you grow (and make sure that you help them grow; iron sharpens iron).
Furthermore this is a good time to elaborate briefly on a mindset that is of utmost importance. Realise that you are judged not as an individual but also on whom your tribe consists of; or simply put, you are being judged on your friends. Coming to this realisation will strengthen both yourself and your tribe. Jealousy and drama has its place in a teenage girl group; amongst valiant men you must look towards the total glory of the tribe (tribe here is used as a term for social context) and thus it becomes apparent that the stronger your brothers are; the stronger you are. Also, be on the lookout for weak and decadent elements within the tribe; their weakness and vulnerability becomes your weakness.
To conclude I would like to recommend this book to all men, this is a great book if you are new to political and philosophical thought. If you have been in the game for a while there might be books that offer more insights, but as a starter book to get guys to get a more realistic and loyal world view; this is the book to start with.
Why Muhammad Ali was not a draft dodger. A Tribalist’s perspective.
Posted on June 12, 2016
Muhammed Ali passed away last week and as was to be expected a debate arose about him. I chose to salute him via pictures on Instagram and Facebook as I think he was worthy of commemorating on his day of passing. He was not just only a great athlete, he was also an athlete who used his fame for something good; he used it to promote his own political ideas. Much like today’s champion, Tyson Fury, who also has a great many good views and seem like a very good man (despite the media trying desperately to portray him as otherwise).
The most common critique against Muhammad Ali is that he was a draft-dodger. In merely technical terms it is true. He avoided getting drawn into the Vietnam war. Was this wrong however? I would wholeheartedly argue no. The Vietnam war was first and foremost a destructive war that hurt the United States more than anything, and gave rise to the extremely destructive Flower Power movement, which was also connected with the leftist currents sweeping over Europe. The Vietnam war itself is not the interesting topic though, the interesting topic is whether Ali was wrong to fight that particular battle. He was not wrong in dodging the draft because it was not his fight, it was not the fight of his tribe. He was an African-American, he was Black. That is not the same tribe as the American Government. Fighting for someone else’s tribe makes you a mercenary. Refusing to fight for another tribe does not make you a coward. Refusing to fight for your own tribe makes you a coward. Refusing to participate in a struggle for your own people makes you immoral. There is a large different in the two.
A real draft-dodger (in the tribal sense) today would be (to give an example) a Swedish man (or any Western European man for that matter) who is not open with his views because he is afraid of being called X (insert generic term used by leftists). A draft-dodger in the United States today is someone who does not support Trump, a draft-dodger in France next year will be someone who does not openly support Front National. A draft-dodger in the Austrain election was anyone who did not vote for FPÖ.
My main point with this article is that your loyalty and your commitment is towards your own people: not anyone else. And to end this elaboration with a good example of courage, here is the young Trump supporter in the midst of protesters being intimidated. You can see that he is afraid (and rightly so) but he overcomes it, it would have been easier for him to just remove his Trump pin and walk away, but he faced down his fear, and that is courageous.
Breakfast With the Dirt Cult by Samuel Finlay. Book Recommendation
Posted on May 27, 2016
I have just read Breakfast With the Dirt Cult by Samuel Finlay. It is based upon a real story and contains great elements of humour yet at the same time contains many a solid and profound truths regarding the post-modern world, including globalism and feminism. It is written by an American veteran and thus contributes with an interesting perspective in regard to how the American elite deals with the regular people that makes up most of their armed forces. On the one hand these people are needed to fill their ranks yet at the same time takes the back-seat in domestic affairs. It becomes quite clear why these regular American citizens are fed up with the politicians of the establishment and see Donald Trump as the best candidate (that there are people that do not support Trump is beyond me).
However, the most interesting aspect of the book is its critique against perhaps the greatest disease of the post-modern world: feminism. Written as a sort of tragic love story it gives voice to some harsh truths that men of this day and age have to deal with. Being raised in a traditional sense these truths can be hard to deal with and many guys do indeed have a rude awakening to it. Feminism, as Finlay so eloquently put it, has made a fine job of bringing out the worst in women. And this is true, as it has become quite apparent in the West with its declining morals and the total disintegration of normal relations between the sexes. Feminism is an extremely dangerous opponent, because it strikes at the bedrock of civilization; the family. A nation can indeed withstand assaults from an exterior foe and survive, alas when it is destroyed from within, it can be hard to recover. The West’s survival is to a large extent dependant upon its ability to defeat feminism and re-instate traditional family values, especially the natural authority of the father.
There are too many profound quoted to be included in this article but below is one that also deals with feminism, alas this time not in relation to the destruction of the family but in regard to the general liberal mind-set that is also plaguing the West at the moment.
– “Yeah but if it was something she really wanted to do and felt like it would make her happy?
– As her father, I’d be a damn sight more concerned about her survival than her happiness. After all, this is war we’re talking about, Amy. People killin’ and dyin’. A girl marchin’ around in a beret and carrying a rifle, and getting fucked by PT studs is all fine and dandy till she gets blown the fuck up and her brains are paintin’ the road and her ovaries are scattered all over some Third World Shithole, or she gets captured and gang-raped in the dirt from hell-to-breakfast.”
https://www.instagram.com/p/BF4XNIsDOzN/?taken-by=thegloriouslion
The Golden One 
You must be logged in to post a comment.